NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1800MHz vs 1557MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
10368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A6000
+3136%
38.71 TFLOPS
Quadro P600
1.196 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A6000
+1505%
17742
Quadro P600
1105
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A6000
+2393%
9324
Quadro P600
374
Blender
RTX A6000
+4315%
5387
Quadro P600
122
OctaneBench
RTX A6000
+2508%
600
Quadro P600
23
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
1329 MHz
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
84
SM Count
3
10752
Shading Units
384
336
TMUs
24
112
ROPs
16
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
201.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.91 GPixel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.37 GTexel/s
38.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.68 GFLOPS
38.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1196 GFLOPS
604.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
40W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GP107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
