NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
9984 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A6000
+3471%
38.71 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
84
SM Count
-
10752
Shading Units
768
336
TMUs
64
112
ROPs
32
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
201.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
38.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
38.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
604.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
