NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
10736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A6000
+148784%
38.71 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
84
SM Count
2
10752
Shading Units
16
336
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
201.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
38.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
38.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
604.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
17W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
