Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
9856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 +5861%
34.1 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A5500 +14286%
4316
Quadro K2000M
30
OctaneBench
RTX A5500 +4866%
596
Quadro K2000M
12

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
10240
Shading Units
384
320
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net