Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 768.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 +146%
34.1 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
10240
Shading Units
7680
320
TMUs
240
96
ROPs
120
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
8 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

230W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy