Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
6912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Mobile +1571%
22.27 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

58
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
7424
Shading Units
512
232
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
48
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
348.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
22.27 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.27 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
348.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22 billion
Transistors
3 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

165W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy