NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1500MHz
Lower TDP (165W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Mobile
+50%
22.27 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2022
Ampere-MW
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
58
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
8192
232
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
128
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
348.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
22.27 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
22.27 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
348.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GA103
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
22 billion
Transistors
8 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
