NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1260MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q
+947%
18.71 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Apr 2016
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
585 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
58
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
768
232
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA103
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.2
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
