NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1260MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
7360 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q
+11593%
18.71 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Feb 2008
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
585 MHz
Base Clock
-
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
58
SM Count
8
7424
Shading Units
64
232
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
80W
TDP
70W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA103
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
