NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1260MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q
+4333%
18.71 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2011
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
585 MHz
Base Clock
-
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
58
SM Count
4
7424
Shading Units
192
232
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA103
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
