Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM

NVIDIA RTX A5000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1350MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
5248 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5000 Max Q +671%
16.59 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 MXM
2.15 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Sep 2016
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
896
192
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

129.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
259.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
16.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
16.59 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
259.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
Baffin
-
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net