Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5000 Max-Q vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

NVIDIA RTX A5000 Max-Q vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5000 Max Q and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1350MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
5824 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5000 Max Q +4220%
16.59 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2009
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
320
192
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
8
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

129.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
259.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
16.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.59 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
259.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net