NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 60W)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1785MHz vs 1537MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Mobile
+72%
6.296 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A500 Mobile
3023
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+6%
3220
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A500 Mobile
+12%
1604
Quadro T2000 Mobile
1426
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
May 2019
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
832 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1537 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
2048
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
49.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
98.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
6.296 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
6.296 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
98.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
