NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1537MHz
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Mobile
+192%
6.296 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A500 Mobile
+49%
3023
Quadro M3000M
2016
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A500 Mobile
+70%
1604
Quadro M3000M
941
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2015
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
832 MHz
Base Clock
-
1537 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
49.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
98.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
6.296 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.296 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
98.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.2
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
