NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1537MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Mobile
+1831%
6.296 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2013
Ampere-MW
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
832 MHz
Base Clock
-
1537 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
49.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
98.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
6.296 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.296 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
98.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
