NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1612MHz vs 1335MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
5.468 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+50%
8.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
20
2048
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
64
Tensor Cores
80
16
RT Cores
20
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
