Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded +540%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net