Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 51W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded +645%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy