NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+23673%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370
0.023 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
2
2048
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
