Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1335MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (20W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
5.468 TFLOPS
GRID A100A +154%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

435 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
6912
64
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
64
Tensor Cores
432
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
7 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
8.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy