Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1650MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (640.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 +2640%
23.65 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1050 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
640.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
7168
Shading Units
384
224
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

158.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
369.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
23.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
369.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
628 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

200W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy