Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 SXM2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1480MHz vs 1215MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Max Q +34%
14.31 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 SXM2
10.61 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
1328 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

46
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
5888
Shading Units
3584
184
TMUs
224
96
ROPs
96
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
142.1 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.5 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.22 TFLOPS
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.61 TFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.304 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GP100
-
GPU Variant
GP100-890-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.0
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy