Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40m to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1215MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
3008 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 245W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded +183%
14.31 TFLOPS
Tesla K40m
5.046 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
RTX A4500 Embedded +613%
485
Tesla K40m
68
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
745 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

46
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
5888
Shading Units
2880
184
TMUs
240
96
ROPs
48
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
245W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy