NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1215MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
4544 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded
+579%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A4500 Embedded
+574%
9884
Quadro K4200
1465
Blender
RTX A4500 Embedded
+2102%
3920
Quadro K4200
178
OctaneBench
RTX A4500 Embedded
+1406%
482
Quadro K4200
32
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
510 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
46
SM Count
-
5888
Shading Units
1344
184
TMUs
112
96
ROPs
32
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
