NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
5760 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded
+3965%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
46
SM Count
16
5888
Shading Units
128
184
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
16
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.20 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
80W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
