Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
5648 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded +3212%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

46
SM Count
5
-
Compute Units
-
5888
Shading Units
240
184
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
32
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy