NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Lower TDP (80W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1410MHz vs 1215MHz)
More VRAM (80GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 384.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded
14.31 TFLOPS
A100 PCIe 80 GB
+36%
19.49 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A4500 Embedded
+5%
3920
A100 PCIe 80 GB
3722
OctaneBench
RTX A4500 Embedded
+55%
482
A100 PCIe 80 GB
310
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2021
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
510 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1512 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
80GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1.94TB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
46
SM Count
108
5888
Shading Units
6912
184
TMUs
432
96
ROPs
160
184
Tensor Cores
432
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
80 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
225.6 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
609.1 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
77.97 TFLOPS
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.49 TFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.746 TFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
7 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
8.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
