NVIDIA RTX A4000H vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4000H 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (2250MHz vs 1560MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 140W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4000H
19.17 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+20%
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
1725 MHz
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
40
6144
Shading Units
5120
192
TMUs
160
96
ROPs
64
192
Tensor Cores
160
48
RT Cores
40
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
140W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
AD104
GA104-???-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
