NVIDIA RTX A4000H vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (2130MHz vs 1560MHz)
Lower TDP (70W vs 140W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4000H
+59%
19.17 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2024
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
22
6144
Shading Units
2816
192
TMUs
88
96
ROPs
48
192
Tensor Cores
88
48
RT Cores
22
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
140W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
AD107
GA104-???-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
