Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A4000 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4000 Max Q +1614%
14.28 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
0.833 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2013
Ampere-MW
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

780 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
352.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
384
160
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
16
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

111.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.680 GPixel/s
223.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.72 GTexel/s
14.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
833.3 GFLOPS
223.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GT 755M
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net