NVIDIA RTX A400 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 50W)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 4x
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
2
16
ROPs
2
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
15W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
VSA-101
-
GPU Variant
Daytona
(355-0025-221)
Ampere
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
180 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
-
