Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 64% (1762MHz vs 1072MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400 +9%
2.706 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 X2
2.47 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro Ampere
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

727 MHz
Base Clock
1006 MHz
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
1072 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
1152
24
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
32
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.73 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.9 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.470 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
102.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-225-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy