NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
+34%
2.706 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Jun 2010
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
1440
24
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
