NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FirePro V3750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
+668%
2.706 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
48W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO
(215-0719056)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
