NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD FirePro S9050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
FirePro S9050
+19%
3.226 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
