NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A3000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1620MHz vs 1230MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A3000 Mobile
+203%
10.08 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A3000 Mobile
+154%
8191
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3220
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A3000 Mobile
+180%
4223
Quadro T2000 Max Q
1505
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
May 2019
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1230 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
32
SM Count
16
4096
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
78.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
157.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
10.08 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
10.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
157.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
