NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A3000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1230MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A3000 Mobile
+9233%
10.08 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Apr 2011
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1230 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
32
SM Count
6
4096
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
128
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
78.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
157.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
10.08 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
157.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
32W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
