Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1252MHz vs 1200MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +1146%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro P400
0.641 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
1228 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1252 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.06GB/s

Render Config

26
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
3328
Shading Units
256
104
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.03 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.03 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.02 GFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
641.0 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.03 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GP107
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
GP107-825-KA-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
12 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy