NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1291MHz vs 1200MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+168%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A2000
+183%
5936
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2096
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A2000
+57%
2712
Quadro P2000 Mobile
1723
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
9
3328
Shading Units
1152
104
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
32
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
GP106
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
12 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
