NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+1296%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
384
104
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
GK107
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
