NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+4438%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
192bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
8
3328
Shading Units
64
104
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
12
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
59W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
G94
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
