NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+1147%
7.987 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
0.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
4
3328
Shading Units
512
104
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
104
Tensor Cores
16
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
10W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
GA10B
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
12 billion
Transistors
Unknown
276 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
