NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1600MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
13056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
7.987 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550
+556%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
16384
104
TMUs
1024
48
ROPs
0
104
Tensor Cores
1024
26
RT Cores
128
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
600W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
12 billion
Transistors
100 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
