NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla M4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Tesla M4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 57% (1687MHz vs 1072MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M4 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+293%
8.637 TFLOPS
Tesla M4
2.195 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A2000 Mobile
4917
Tesla M4
+8%
5323
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A2000 Mobile
+19%
2836
Tesla M4
2375
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2015
Ampere-MW
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
872 MHz
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
1072 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.30 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.61 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.195 TFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
68.61 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GM206
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.2
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
