NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
2208 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 152W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+1096%
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro 5000
0.722 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2011
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
-
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
120.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
11
2560
Shading Units
352
80
TMUs
44
48
ROPs
40
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
640 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.29 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.57 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
722.3 GFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
361.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
152W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
