Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (2050MHz vs 1687MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
8.637 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +94%
16.79 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2022
Ampere-MW
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1215 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
32
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

95W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net