NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1687MHz
Lower TDP (95W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
8.637 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
+70%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Ampere-MW
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
-
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
8192
80
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
