NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (2025MHz vs 1207MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
6.18 TFLOPS
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
+34%
8.294 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2024
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
2025 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
16
2560
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
64
20
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.80 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.294 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
