NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce MX130
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX130 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1207MHz vs 1189MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+576%
6.18 TFLOPS
GeForce MX130
0.913 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2017
Ampere-MW
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
1109 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
1189 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.512 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.54 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
913.2 GFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.54 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N16S-GTR-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
