NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1207MHz vs 758MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+203%
6.18 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680M
2.038 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Ampere-MW
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
719 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
758 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1344
80
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.22 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
84.90 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.038 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.90 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N13E-GTX-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
